zenaudio wrote:...Perhaps audio is still in its adolescence where standard physics-psychoacoustic characteristics still need to be defined (the equivalent of citrusy, spicy etc) to be used as handles in designing sound from a combination of audio equipment. In the perfume industry, science and sense have been calibrated with each other. In audio maybe that still has to come. Some may be starting, who knows they're close or already there.
Oldfogey wrote:Having read through this thread, I'm impressed by the depth of knowledge and eloquence of the members who've posted.
I'm firmly in the "qualitative appraisal" camp myself. IMHO, if it sounds good to my tin ears, it is good. I don't attach much importance to measurements, primarily because they get in the way of a good bottle of wine!
Enjoy your music this holiday season! Cheers!
JackD201 wrote:Oldfogey wrote:Having read through this thread, I'm impressed by the depth of knowledge and eloquence of the members who've posted.
I'm firmly in the "qualitative appraisal" camp myself. IMHO, if it sounds good to my tin ears, it is good. I don't attach much importance to measurements, primarily because they get in the way of a good bottle of wine!
Enjoy your music this holiday season! Cheers!
Idolfogey,
May we request a list of wines that result in the most musical enjoyment? A purely qualitative assesment if you please.
Oldfogey wrote:Actually, it's the music and conversation that make the wine taste better.
Happy New Year!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests